Neo-Classical Characters of ATLA

The three gauges of your classical are ethos, pathos, and logos. Each of these gauges are a persuasive approach to rhetoric. Ethos deals with ethics or judge of character. Pathos deal in emotions and feelings. Logos deals in reason. The characters in Avatar the Last Airbender can also fit this model. The basis of their character can be seen as an embodiment of one of these three gauges. Examples are as follows.

Starting with ethos I feel that since this tenant deals with a judge of character and ethics that a suitable character from the show that embodies these characteristics would be Uncle Iroh. Uncle Iroh is a very ethical character and influences other characters to become more ethical as well. He challenges their character to become better. We can see how he does this with Zuko.

Uncle Iroh teaches a mugger

Pathos is based in emotions and feeling and characters that are driven by emotion and feelings, in my opinion, would be Firelord Ozai or Azula. Both of them lead from a standpoint of striking fear into their subjects in order to get compliance. They are very prideful and overconfident. This ultimately ends in their demise but for the sake of argument I feel as though these two are an accurate choice for a personal representation of pathos.

Azula’s meltdown

For Logos I think the most accurate character to represent this tenant would be Sokka or possibly King Bumi. We get more interaction and see more development with Sokka than we do Bumi but I feel he’s also a fair candidate. They are both very intelligent and we see them employing abstract thinking. Sokka is very much a reason and logic type of individual.

Sokka’s intellect

These are characters and examples of characters that for the most part stay within one of these tenants. However there are other characters that will go from one to another and that is something that we see in the show as well. Example of this would be Prince Zuko starting off in pathos because he is trying to regain honor and is very emotion driven and we can see that in his rage however we see him by the end of the show coming into the tenant of ethos after the tutelage of his uncle. Aang also fits this transition from pathos to ethos because in the beginning we see him running from his problems and operating on an emotional level in fear but as he goes through his journey we see him have more interactions with the other tenants.

3 responses to “Neo-Classical Characters of ATLA”

  1. Using different characters from the show is a great way to explain neo classical. From memory, you’ve done a great job at identifying the ways each character differs from one another and the different models of proof.
    One thing that would help readers understand your points more is a elaborating on your examples. This would be especially helpful considering I haven’t seen the show in years and some readers might not have ever seen the show. For example, when talking about the way Uncle Iroh using emotion to connect with Zuko you may want to include examples. The clip you have currently is a great example of uncle Iroh using emotion but you are talking about a different character with you analysis.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Your post was well written and organized and I feel like the video clips help better elaborate on the characters. I like that you gave a description about each character and gave a description about their personality trait before showing each clip.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I think you have chosen your examples well here! The imagery helps as support, but your explanation of each is even better. You have segmented the paragraphs well, and this was easy to follow. Good work!

    Some writing suggestions when you revise: italicize the name of the series. You mean tenets (principles) not tenants (like renters).

    Remember, ethos is about character, not just credibility, and Itoh is a stellar exemplar. Why? Give us a smidgen more to support the character part and back out some of the cred. The pathos example is a little fuzzier; they persuade using fear. Absolutely pathos. But you collapse it a little with ethos (their own character), rather than how they USE fear as a persuasive tool. Clean that up a bit when you revise (not now — for the final post assignment). The final section is fine as is.

    A solid post, all around 🙂 Keep up the great work!

    Like

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started