Avatar and Pentad

This post will explore a moment in Avatar The Last Airbender using the Pentad method. The event being examined will be when Aang faces Ozai and takes away his bending. The point of this examination will be to find the motive of why Aang chose to remove Ozai’s bending instead of killing him to end the war.

The Act is the action of taking the bending. The war had progressed to the point that the confrontation between these two individuals could no longer be avoided. There was no option for compromise, one had to be eliminated for the other to succeed. Defeat of the other was the only way of accomplishing their goal. However, the means of that defeat had flexibility.

The Agent was Aang as he was the one who did the action. He used the avatar state to strip Ozai of his bending instead of killing Ozai. Aang was raised by the monks of the air temples and was taught that all life is sacred. His beliefs influenced his choices and an example of this that we see throughout the series is that he doesn’t eat meat.

The Scene is the canyon they had their battle in. Aang intercepted Ozai’s fleet of airships and confronted him while his team works to debilitate and take down the fleet. The fight goes around and throughout the plateaus and rock spires of the canyon.

The Agency is the avatar state. That is how the bending was taken. The avatar state is a power connected to the spirit world since that was where it originated from. The bending also come from the elemental lion turtles who gave each bending to the first human who would become the first Avatar. Aang encounters one of these lion turtles before his confrontation with Ozai.

The Purpose of taking Ozai’s bending is to end the war and remove the power of the Fire Nation’s advance. Killing Ozai would have possibly done the same but went against Aang’s beliefs and teachings. This act served as a permanent yet nonlethal way to end the war and the threat of the Fire Lord. This leads into my conclusion of the motive.

Aang needed a man’s of ending the war while keeping to his morals and beliefs. He needed a way to have mercy while still being firm so that Ozai would not become a martyr and another could seek to continue the war out of vengeance. This act of taking Ozai’s bending took the power away from the Fire Nation in a peaceful way. Ozai was no longer a threat without his bending and could not stand trial for his crimes. It also send as an example for others who might seek to challenge the Avatar and the other nations seeking dominion over them. This peaceful resolution is the motive I have come to for why Aang chose to remove Ozai’s bending.

7 responses to “Avatar and Pentad”

  1. I think this is a great use of the pentad. Though there is so much to this scene (especially since it is the culmination of the series), I can immediately tell where you want to put your emphasis within the method, and bringing Aang’s character development into the post in order to justify your judgment also creates a much more agreeable conclusion.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Daniel! First off I believe you did a great application to the the Pentad this Avatar The Last Airbender. Your analytical process to all 5 terms is accurate and explained well. You also established the motive and the goal for Aang and why he rolled with his decision. You did mention early on how there was no compromise but not how Ozai had a different motive. I think this would give more insight on the two different motives and why which makes the outcomes more important. Adding some pictures of the scene would have been pretty cool and shown the intensity of it. There is also a few grammar mistakes but overall your analysis is spot on and well thought!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hi Daniel! I think this scene was an excellent choice for the Pentad. I would include one of our class texts to help scholastically define the Pentad, and then include what you said already along with it. A works cited list is on the required list for these assignments, so I want to make sure that you don’t miss out on points! As for your description of the agent: Aang is the primary agent here, but there can be multiple agents in the pentad- so I would include Ozai in there as well! The scene description could use some more specifics: when is this taking place? Where is this canyon at/what is its significance? In my class notes the day we discussed this method, it was mentioned that the ratios/relationships between the five elements should also be identified. For example, I discussed the Pentad in my post for this week as well, and mentioned that the ratio between agent-agency was super important in the context of the film I discussed. In this finale, I would say that the purpose-agent ratio is vital to understanding the motive behind Aang’s decision. I’m excited to see what else you mention!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Your analysis using the Pentad is well-structured and it effectively breaks down the five terms to pave way to a thoughtful exploration of Aang’s motive for sparing Ozai’s life. I believe if you incorporated some more visuals, like snippets of the episode or a picture of Ozai’s reaction when he knew he lost the battle, it would make it more engaging for the readers. You also mentioned the battle at the canyon but did not really imply any significance or symbolism of the conflict between Aang and Ozai. Having a little more background on the conflict between the two would add more depth into your analysis. I really enjoyed reading this post and I’m looking forward for some more.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Oh man, so so close. You have a solid introduction and conclusion, a clear thesis, and ample support for each element of the pentad. You’ve used all the steps, and you have an appropriate claim (motive). This is a superb example for trying the pentad, and you have written this clearly.

    In the final paragraph, I think you mean “means” in the first line. Typo.

    So, why close and not out of the park? One more step on motive. I think you have set up that his real motive is neutralizing peacefully IN ORDER TO live in accordance with his own ethical principles. You have the evidence here, so this is just one more line 🙂

    Great job on this post, truly. Keep up the good work!

    Like

  6. Hey Daniel. You have written a really good post that is structured nicely and identifies the different elements of pentad. To make your argument stronger, it might be beneficial to briefly explain the purpose of pentad in texts. I don’t think this needs to be long since you individually identify and label the different elements now.
    Building off of Dr. Jones comment, pentad needs to always end with the motive. So in this text, it would be focusing more on why Aang takes away the powers of fire king instead of killing him. Sure, it’s to end the war but why else? You’ve already identified why he chose to end the war this way in your opening paragraph, you just need to reintroduce the idea to the readers.
    Overall, a good analysis on what I believe to be a more difficult method to use!

    Like

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started