Ideography and Avatar the Last Airbender

Ideography is used to find meaning and it is often found in two sources. One source of meaning comes from myth and more specifically this meaning comes from something that is intangible. It is an experience instead of a thing. The other source is ideology, which often comes from a tangible object. In Avatar The Last Airbender there was a specific scene that came to mind with this topic. I feel that it aptly addresses the ideology of the Fire Nation and the war that they started. Ideology can be culturally based and it seems appropriate to apply that concept to the Fire Nation and the war that they initiated. The following clip is the scene that came to mind for this post.

Zuko confronts his father

Zuko states that he was told as a child that the war was the Fire Nation’s way of sharing their greatness with the world. The ideology here is that the Fire Nation is the correct culture and way of life and that by advancing on the other nations they were going to share that culture and way of life with the rest of the world. One thing that the Fire Nation did first in their campaign was the elimination of the Air Nomads. This could have simply been decided because it was believed that the Avatar was to be incarnated among the Air Nomads and if they were able to eliminate the Avatar then that would reset the reincarnation cycle and give them a head start on dominating the rest of the nations. I don’t feel that the idea of sharing their greatness was meant to encourage the other nations to succumb to the Fire Nation but rather to alleviate guilt from the Fire Nation itself and all the citizens that were going to become the soldiers of this war.

This ideology of sharing the culture of the Fire Nation allow the citizens of the Fire Nation to overlook the invasions and the brutality that was being demonstrated. Zuko points out that the other nations fear the Fire Nation and firebenders as a whole because of the war. The other nations have experienced oppression and cruelty at the hand of firebenders and as a result it has branded all firebenders and all associations with the Fire Nation to be evil. The war might have been encouraged by “sharing their greatness” but the end result was the very emblem of the Fire Nation being demonized and fire bending being seen as an attribute of that demon that was oppressing them. Firebenders were not trusted neither were non-benders that were citizens of the Fire Nation.

The ideology that the culture of the Fire Nation is the best way and because it is the best it must be the only way demonstrates how dangerous ideology can be. Ideology cannot prove the existence of an absolute truth because an ideology cannot be tested. Ideologies change over time but an absolute truth cannot change otherwise it would not be an absolute truth. The myth here is that the Fire Nation’s culture is the superior one. The tangible thing that is leading to this ideology is the ability of fire bending itself. The Fire Lord believes that firebending is the superior bending because of the power that it has given him and the fear that it strikes into those that it is aimed at. While it is possibly the more aggressive of the bendings, each bending serves a purpose and when they all come together that is when peace and prosperity can take place. Before the war there was peace and prosperity between the nations. Zuko also states that the correct ideology that should be implemented is that of peace and kindness. The two ideologies that are at work against each other in this war would be that of Fire Lord Ozai and of, Uncle Iroh. Ozai’s ideology is that of power and fear while Iroh’s ideology is that of peace and kindness.

6 responses to “Ideography and Avatar the Last Airbender”

  1. Hi Daniel! You provide clear examples with explanations that point out their strong values. You also point out how the character’s ideology is shaped as well as their actions. I think this was done very well by also showing how the ideologies clash within the show of Zuko’s father and Uncle. For your next post, try breaking up the paragraphs so it’s more easier to follow. Overall great job on the ideology impact and application!

    Like

  2. Zuko is one of the best written characters in fiction, period, and the scene you provided is one of the strongest points of the show for you to use! I would ask for you to point out specific symbols or pieces of dialogue embedded that help demonstrate the ideology, besides just Zuko saying it directly. For example, the skeleton of Monk Gyatso at Aang’s former air temple is a symbol of the Fire Nation’s “greatness.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Another angle I can bring up is how when Sokka learned swordsmanship from the sword master, I forget his name, and the master knew that Sokka wasn’t from the Fire Nation but taught him anyway because he said, “swordsmanship is not owned by the Fire Nation”, or something to guy extent. That is a positive way of sharing the greatness of the Fire Nation with the world, by sharing their skill of swordsmanship.

      Like

  3. Hi Daniel! I literally just watched the “Day of Black Sun” arc, and you couldn’t have chosen a better example topic for ideology than the Fire Nation’s “greatness”. I think one of the most powerful images in the entire show is when Ba Sing Se is under siege, and a Fire Nation banner is placed over the Earth King’s palace. Some minor notes:
    -In your second to last paragraph, there is a typo: I assume you meant “oppressing”.
    -You could add images of the Fire Nation insignia in various places it shouldn’t be, i.e. The Drill, or on the Earth King’s palace, to further demonstrate their desire to “share” their greatness with the world.

    PS- The master swordsman you are referring to in your comment is Master Piandao 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you. These are great suggestions.

      Like

  4. Hey Daniel! What a great scene to talk about ideography. I think you explain the ideographs really clearly. At the end of your post, you bring in the ideology of Uncle Iroh and compare his ideology with Ozai. I think this is fine, but it seemed to come without much context. It would helpful to see this idea intertwined throughout the post so readers can see how you’re connecting to the two ideologies of Ozai and Iroh.

    Like

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started